第二个原因，与罗贯中本人可能有关系。罗贯中是元末明初人，参加过张士诚的农民起义，当过张士诚的幕僚，史书上说罗贯中这个人有志图王，什么意思呢？就是他也是一个想出来辅佐一个人成就帝王之业的，只不过在后来的斗争中是朱元璋胜利了，他没有能够实现自己的理想，和诸葛亮一样是出师未捷，不过他身没死就是了，罗贯中没死，但是这种失落感、寂寞感是一样的，所以他在塑造诸葛亮这个人物形象的时候，难免寄托自己的一些想法。何况诸葛亮这个人确实是中国古代读书人的一个榜样，中国古代读书人差不多都是有诸葛亮情结的，就是自觉不自觉地就把自个比做诸葛亮了。
The second reason may have something to do with Luo Guanzhong himself. Luo Guanzhong was born in the late Yuan and early Ming dynasties. He participated in the peasant uprising of Zhang Shicheng and served as a staff member of Zhang Shicheng. According to historical records, Luo Guanzhong had a ambition to become a king. What does that mean? He was also a person who wanted to assist someone in achieving the cause of the emperor. However, in the subsequent struggle, Zhu Yuanzhang won. He failed to achieve his ideals, and like Zhuge Liang, he failed to succeed in his apprenticeship. However, he was not dead, and Luo Guanzhong was not dead. However, this sense of loss and loneliness were the same. Therefore, when he created the character image of Zhuge Liang, it was inevitable to place some thoughts on his own. Moreover, Zhuge Liang is indeed a role model for ancient Chinese scholars, who almost all had a Zhuge Liang complex, consciously or unconsciously comparing themselves to Zhuge Liang.
但是我们有一个问题，就是中国古代作为文化人精神偶像的很多啊，文天祥他也是精神偶像，岳飞也是精神偶像，还有很多这样的人，为什么惟独诸葛亮在中国读书人、文化人、知识分子，在人民群众当中他那个地位那么崇高呢？很重要的一个原因就是三顾茅庐，就是其他的不管岳飞、文天祥也好都不是皇上三请四请请出来的，就诸葛亮一个人请了三回。而中国古代的读书人他有一个矛盾心理，就是一方面他很想出来做事情，所谓学成文武艺，贷与帝王家，他这一肚子满腹的经纶，一肚子的学问，一身的本事，他有一个地方使啊，他要使用出来，他只有找一个好老板，因为他自己做不了老板；但是另一个方面他又清高，他的心理又很脆弱，他受不得打击，受不了冷遇，不愿意自己腆着脸找上门去让人家踢出来，最好是所有的老板所有的皇帝都是恭恭敬敬上门去请他出来，而这样的例子只有这一个。那么罗贯中作为这样的一个读书人，这样一个文化人，他摆出这个事情他能不大做文章吗？他肯定要大写特写，这个我猜测可能就是《三国演义》这个“三顾茅庐”它背后的这样一种心理。
However, we have a question. There are many spiritual idols of cultural people in ancient China. Wen Tianxiang is also a spiritual idol, and Yue Fei is also a spiritual idol. There are many such people. Why is Zhuge Liang the only one who holds such a high position among Chinese scholars, intellectuals, and the people? One important reason is that Sangu Mao Lu was not invited out by the emperor three times, no matter Yue Fei or Wen Tianxiang. Zhuge Liang alone invited out three times. In ancient China, a scholar had a contradictory mentality. On the one hand, he was eager to come out and do things. The so-called “learning civil and martial arts skills, lending to the imperial family,” with his wealth of economic knowledge, knowledge, and skills, he had a place to use it, and he had to find a good boss because he couldn’t be a boss himself; However, on the other hand, he is noble and mentally fragile, unable to withstand shocks and coldness, and unwilling to face up and ask others to kick him out. It is best for all bosses and emperors to respectfully come and invite him out, and this is the only example. So, as such a scholar and cultural person, can Luo Guanzhong not make a fuss about this matter? “He must make a capital close-up, which I suspect may be the psychology behind the” Three Kingdoms “, the” Three Gu Mao Lu “.”.
那么不管怎么说，“三顾茅庐”是中国历史上一件非常有意义的事情，其实在我看来，是刘备先找诸葛亮，还是诸葛亮先找刘备，是见了三次谈了三次，还是去了三次谈了一次，都不是很重要，重要的是他们谈了什么。如果说他们真的是谈了三次，我们就无法知道它的全部内容，我们只知道一个结论性的意见，那就是隆中对，在“隆中对”里面诸葛亮的政治天才表现得淋漓尽致，“隆中对”也成为中国古代一篇有名的对策。但是很少有人知道在七年以前，也就是建安五年的时候，还有一个人向孙权提出了类似的建议，这个人也和诸葛亮一样主张“先三分、后一统”，那么这个人是谁呢？请看下集——隆中对策。
Anyway, “Sangumao Lu” is a very significant event in Chinese history. In fact, in my opinion, whether Liu Bei first sought Zhuge Liang or Zhuge Liang first sought Liu Bei, whether he had met three times to talk about it, or whether he had gone three times to talk about it once, is not very important. What matters is what they talked about. “If they really talked about it three times, we wouldn’t be able to know the full content of it. We only know one conclusive opinion, that is, the Long Zhong Pai. In the” Long Zhong Pai “, Zhuge Liang’s political genius displayed incisively and vividly. The” Long Zhong Pai “has also become a famous countermeasure in ancient China.”. However, few people know that seven years ago, in the fifth year of Jian’an, there was another person who proposed a similar proposal to Sun Quan. This person, like Zhu Geliang, also advocated “first three divisions, then one unity.” So who is this person? Please see the next episode – Longzhong Countermeasures.
