吕先生说，一个成大事的人是不会计较别人的议论的，要成就大事的人都是把毁誉置之度外的，他要做大事情他哪里有工夫去理会这些闲言碎语，唧唧喳喳？爱说说去，我行我素，不会因为是皇后说的他就怎么的。而且这个道理上是完全讲不通，是不是，皇后是什么，皇后是中宫之主，母仪天下，哪里是随便就可以说非就废，说杀就杀的？就算要废要杀那也是皇帝的权力，不是丞相的权力，丞相有什么权力废皇后杀皇后？何况皇后没有罪啊，皇后是转述皇帝的话，皇帝说了丞相的坏话，丞相来帮皇帝废皇后，这个于理也不通嘛。当然有人说，这就正好证明曹操是个贼，汉献帝窝囊得不得了。是，没错，曹操是大权独揽，皇帝也确实是十分窝囊，但是你要知道当时的情况，面子上还是要维护的，曹操这个时候哪怕是假仁假义，他也得装模作样，不可以这样公开和皇帝撕破脸皮。
Mr. Lv said that a person who achieves great things will not care about the comments of others, and those who want to achieve great things will ignore their reputations. If he wants to do great things, how can he have the time to ignore these gossip and chatter? Love to talk, go your own way, not just because the queen said it. And this principle is completely unreasonable, isn’t it? What is the queen? The queen is the master of the central palace, and the mother instrument of the world. Where is it that one can casually say “kill or discard”? Even if you want to abolish or kill, it is also the power of the emperor, not the power of the prime minister. What power does the prime minister have to abolish the queen and kill the queen? What’s more, the empress has no sin. The empress relayed the emperor’s words, and the emperor spoke ill of the prime minister. The prime minister came to help the emperor depose the empress, which makes no sense. Of course, some people say that this just proves that Cao Cao is a thief, and Emperor Xian of Han is extremely weak. Yes, that’s right. Cao Cao is in charge of all power, and the emperor is indeed very weak. However, you should know the situation at that time, and face still needs to be protected. Even if Cao Cao is hypocritical at this time, he must pretend to be a hypocrite, and it is not allowed to publicly tear the face of the emperor.
所以吕先生认为这个事情一定背后有真相，就是实际上是背后有一个，用他的话说就是有一个天大的阴谋。这个阴谋皇帝、皇后可能都卷入了，就是冲着曹操来的，要怎么怎么样对付曹操，那么败露了以后曹操的办法就是拿皇后出气，把皇后整掉。这个阴谋因为太大了，它不能公开，这个真相绝对不能公开，必须捂着，所以随便胡乱找了个岔子，说皇后写了这么一封信。我怀疑这封信皇后就没写，是曹操编的，捏造出来的，陷害皇后的，遮掩真相的，但是大家心知肚明，都不能说穿，所以皇帝也不能救皇后，就这么稀里糊涂地、不明不白地把这个伏皇后杀了。为什么要捏造这封信呢？因为伏完已经死了，皇后的父亲已经死了，死无对证，皇后又是一个弱女子，所以这样一个弱女子就变成了政治斗争的牺牲品，某些臭男人的替罪羊。大概真相应该是这个样子。
So Mr. Lv believes that there must be a truth behind this matter, which is actually a conspiracy behind it. In his words, there is a great conspiracy. The emperor and empress may have been involved in this conspiracy, which was aimed at Cao Cao. How to deal with Cao Cao? After being exposed, Cao Cao’s method is to take the empress out of anger and get rid of her. “This plot is too big to be disclosed, and the truth must not be disclosed. Therefore, I casually made a mistake and said that the Queen wrote such a letter.”. “I suspect that the Empress didn’t write this letter. It was fabricated by Cao Cao, framed by the Empress, and concealed the truth. However, everyone knows it well and can’t put it through. Therefore, the Emperor can’t save the Empress, and he killed the Fu Empress in such a muddled and unclear way.”. Why fabricate this letter? “Because Fu Wan has died, the queen’s father has died, and there is no proof of death. The queen is also a weak woman, so such a weak woman has become a victim of political struggle and a scapegoat for some smelly men.”. Probably the truth should be like this.
所以这种事情荀彧是不可能掺和进去的，荀彧怎么会掺和这种事情呢？因为荀彧是一个什么样的人？是一个非常正派的人，他的正派和正直在朝廷当中是有名的，众所皆知。所以这样的正派的人他不可能参与到这种阴谋诡计里面去，曹操也不会去找他，因为正派人搞阴谋诡计他不内行啊，而且搞这种阴谋诡计在曹操手底下有的是人，他干吗找荀彧呢。所以荀彧不可能是因为这件事情跟曹操翻脸，那么荀彧又为什么和曹操闹到了那种地步呢？
＊从易中天先生的分析来看，在荀彧之死的三种说法中，第三种说法极不可靠，以荀彧的人品和作风来看，他是不可能做出一些不正当的事情的。那么荀彧到底是怎么死的？史书记载的前两种说法，哪一种是真实的呢？
So it’s impossible for Xun Yu to get involved in such things. How could Xun Yu get involved in such things? Because what kind of person is Xun Yu? “He is a very decent person, and his integrity and integrity are well known in the imperial court.”. Therefore, it is impossible for such a decent person to participate in such intrigues and tricks, and Cao Cao will not go to find him, because decent people are not adept at such intrigues and tricks, and there are many people under Cao Cao’s control who engage in such intrigues and tricks. Why should he seek Xun Yu. So it’s impossible for Xunyu to turn against Cao Cao because of this matter. So why did Xunyu get so involved with Cao Cao?
According to Mr. Yi Zhongtian’s analysis, the third statement of the death of Xunyu is extremely unreliable. Judging from Xunyu’s personality and style, it is impossible for him to do anything improper. So how on earth did Xun Yu die? Which of the first two statements recorded in historical records is true?
